Authorising counsel in Vietnam works by a written document with an enumerated scope, not the automatic agency relationship of many common-law systems. Counsel holding a general authorisation can file and attend sessions, but when admitting part of a claim to trade for a favourable settlement, the court will require that right to be expressly in the scope.
The first question is not procedure but the legal nature of the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default: characterise it correctly and every later step stands on firm ground.
1. Current legal basis
Articles 85 to 87 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015 on authorised representatives: the authorisation document defines the scope, and decisions fundamentally altering rights, such as admitting a claim, major settlement concessions or withdrawing the petition, must be expressly written into the scope to count before the court.
2. How the rules apply to the situation
One layer of analysis is often skipped: the knock-on effects beyond the two parties when handling the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default. A decision today will be re-read by tax authorities, banks or other partners in later procedures. Because Articles 85 to 87 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015 on authorised representatives: the authorisation document defines the scope, and decisions fundamentally altering rights, such as admitting a claim, major settlement concessions or withdrawing the petition, must be expressly written into the scope to count before the court, every document created in this process must survive being read independently, out of its original context.
A typical file on this issue usually begins exactly like this: Authorising counsel in Vietnam works by a written document with an enumerated scope, not the automatic agency relationship of many common-law systems. Counsel holding a general authorisation can file and attend sessions, but when admitting part of a claim to trade for a favourable settlement, the court will require that right to be expressly in the scope. From that starting point, Articles 85 to 87 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015 on authorised representatives: the authorisation document defines the scope, and decisions fundamentally altering rights, such as admitting a claim, major settlement concessions or withdrawing the petition, must be expressly written into the scope to count before the court decides which side holds the evidential initiative, and also decides which questions must be answered in writing before any money moves.
3. Sequence and action checklist
Step 1: check limitation and preconditions (contractual negotiation or mediation steps, specifically for the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default, where agreed) before drafting the filing — this step applies directly to the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default.
Step 2: build the evidence set fact by fact, specifically for the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default, marking what is missing and where it can be obtained — this step applies directly to the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default.
Step 3: draft the procedural document in the correct form and jurisdiction and file it with the fee advance on the accepting body’s notice — this step applies directly to the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default.
Step 4: track procedural milestones on a case-specific calendar, specifically for the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default, never on individual memory — this step applies directly to the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default.
Step 5: prepare a fallback plan for each possible outcome, specifically for the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default, including a timely appeal and enforcement as soon as the document takes effect — this step applies directly to the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default.
4. Risks and post-check notes
Changing or revoking authorisation takes effect with the court from its receipt of valid notice; parties who skipped that notice have had process documents continue to be served on former counsel while deadlines ran unknown to them.
A final note on currency when handling the power of attorney for counsel and acts not authorised by default: every citation in this article was checked as at 20/10/2026; instruments once applied but since replaced retain only historical reference value and must not ground current handling.
This article has been quality-reviewed by the FLAW AI Legal Council