Samsung, Intel, LEGO, Apple (via partners) — multinationals keep choosing Vietnam as their second base beyond China. Why Vietnam and not India, Mexico or Indonesia? The answer lies not in one factor but in a hard-to-copy combination of five advantages. Understanding this logic helps Chinese investors position correctly: what am I here for, and which advantages will still exist in ten years.
Five reasons multinationals pick Vietnam as second base
1. Next to China — “China + 1” literally
The strategy is China + 1, not “replace China”. Vietnam shares a border with China: components, materials and equipment travel from China to Vietnam in days by road — something India or Mexico cannot offer. Companies can keep Chinese supply chains (sourcing components) while moving only final assembly to Vietnam — the hybrid model optimising cost versus transition.
2. The region’s deepest FTA network
Vietnam is in CPTPP, EVFTA, RCEP plus many bilateral FTAs — “Made in Vietnam” enters the EU, Japan and Korea at preferential tariffs Chinese goods don’t get. For globally-exporting groups, this is a direct tariff reason: the same plant earns higher margins in Vietnam.
3. Competitive costs + young workforce
Wages, industrial-park rents and operating costs run below China (though the gap narrows), with a young, highly literate population. For labour-intensive sectors the cost math still favours Vietnam — especially combined with CIT incentives for large projects.
4. Political stability and policy consistency
Regionally, Vietnam rates high on political stability, with FDI policy consistent across terms. For 20–30 year investments, institutional predictability matters as much as cost — where Vietnam beats many regional rivals.
5. Formed industrial clusters
Bac Ninh – Bac Giang – Hai Phong (electronics), Binh Duong – Dong Nai (multi-sector), Quang Ninh – Hai Phong (logistics): industrial clusters with suppliers, logistics and services already running. New investors don’t build ecosystems from zero — they plug into existing ones.
Takeaways for Chinese investors
Lesson 1: Don’t enter Vietnam just for “cheap” — enter for the advantage bundle (China proximity + FTAs + clusters), because any single advantage can erode. Lesson 2: Locate by industry cluster (electronics to Bac Ninh – Bac Giang, garments southward), not just land price. Lesson 3: Use investment incentives under Investment Law 143/2025/QH15 — large, high-tech projects earn CIT holidays and infrastructure support. Lesson 4: Bring your suppliers — every multinational succeeding in Vietnam brought its supply chain; none went alone.
Change management — bringing Chinese staff over or hiring Vietnamese?
The 18-month “parallel” model
Months 1–6: Chinese staff lead (foremen, chief technicians) — Vietnamese learn (deputies, shadowing). Months 7–12: Vietnamese run operations — Chinese supervise remotely (advisors). Months 13–18: Chinese phase out (1–2 advisors left) — Vietnamese fully in charge. Why: withdrawing Chinese staff too early (month 3) → factory chaos; keeping them too long (3 years) → Vietnamese never grow + expat costs balloon.
Management culture — three “friction points”
(1) Discipline vs flexibility: Chinese managers tend to be strict (heavy penalties, rigid hours) — Vietnamese workers react (mass post-Tet resignations). Adjust: keep core discipline (safety, quality) — relax non-core items (flexible hours, generous Tet bonuses). (2) Communication: Chinese managers rarely explain (“just do it”) — Vietnamese workers need the why. Adjust: train Chinese managers in communication skills (or place Vietnamese foremen/interpreters as bridges). (3) Advancement: Vietnamese workers want to see promotion paths (team leader, foreman) — if all senior roles are Chinese, nobody commits. Adjust: publish the “Vietnamese into management within X years” roadmap.
Technology transfer to Vietnamese staff — never “hoard the craft”
Some Chinese experts “hoard” know-how (never teaching fully, fearing job loss) — the plant stays dependent forever. Counter: (1) expert contracts include training obligations (how many Vietnamese, to what level); (2) document every process (Vietnamese SOPs) — knowledge lives in documents, not just in experts’ heads; (3) reward successful trainers (train your replacement → promotion/raise — making “hoarding” disadvantageous).
The language bridge — often underestimated
Language is the hidden tax on every China-to-Vietnam transfer. Reality: Chinese managers who speak no Vietnamese and Vietnamese workers who speak no Chinese communicate through interpreters — every instruction loses fidelity, every problem slows down. Solutions: (1) hire bilingual supervisors (Vietnamese who studied/worked in China — a growing talent pool) as the management layer; (2) run basic Vietnamese courses for Chinese managers (6 months reaches shop-floor level); (3) standardise visual SOPs (photos, diagrams — language-independent). Companies that invest in language report far fewer shop-floor misunderstandings — the cheapest productivity investment available.
Why groups choose Vietnam — three core reasons
(1) Concentration risk: “all eggs in one basket” (China) — tariffs, geopolitics → needing a “second basket”. (2) Customer mandates: Apple, Nike… forcing suppliers to diversify (or lose orders). (3) Cost: Vietnamese wages below China’s (though narrowing) + FDI incentives. Note: reasons evolve (2018: tariffs; 2024: geopolitics + customers) — know your own reason to choose right.
Matching reason to strategy — different whys, different hows
Your reason dictates your playbook: tariff-driven (need rules-of-origin compliance — substantial transformation in Vietnam, not relabeling); customer-driven (need auditable Vietnam operations — customers inspect; Potemkin factories fail audits); cost-driven (need scale — Vietnam’s advantage is meaningful only at volume); risk-driven (need genuine redundancy — a second source that can’t actually produce is fiction). Mixed reasons need sequenced execution (satisfy the urgent driver first — usually tariffs or customers — then build toward the strategic ones). Clarity of purpose prevents the classic failure: a tariff factory that can’t pass origin audits, or a customer showcase that can’t make money.
Positioning checklist for Vietnam entry
(1) Define the purpose: which markets served (US, EU, Japan?) — to compute FTA advantage; (2) pick clusters by sector (electronics: Bac Ninh–Bac Giang–Hai Phong; multi-sector: Binh Duong–Dong Nai); (3) assess existing suppliers — who can follow, who must be found locally; (4) model CIT incentives under Investment Law 143/2025/QH15; (5) plan staffing: expat management + local workforce training; (6) prepare IRC/ERC procedures under Decree 96/2026/ND-CP. Principle: enter Vietnam for strategy, not fashion — strategists stay 20 years, fashion-followers exit in 3.
Contact us
FLAT Law Firm advises Chinese investors in Vietnam across the full lifecycle: investment structuring, IRC/ERC procedures, tax, labour, intellectual property and dispute resolution. Contact us for advice tailored to your case.
This article has been quality-reviewed by the FLAW AI Legal Council