Withdrawing capital is not a matter of “just wiring it home”: when a Chinese investor reduces contributed capital, pulls part of its stake from the Vietnamese company, or downsizes the project, the ODI file in China must be amended accordingly — because the MOFCOM certificate and NDRC record still show the old investment scale. Without synchronisation, the investor ends up in the trap of “withdrawn in Vietnam, still recorded as invested in China” — the repatriated money has no lawful channel for recognition, and the next outbound injection stalls on the unclosed old file. This article guides the coordinated withdrawal process: capital reduction, partial withdrawal, and partial transfers.
Forms of “withdrawal” and their ODI requirements
Reducing charter/investment capital
When the Vietnamese company reduces its charter capital (returning part of the contribution to the Chinese investor), Vietnam requires the capital-reduction procedure under the 2020 Enterprise Law and IRC amendment (reducing total investment capital) under the Investment Law 2025. In parallel, in China the enterprise must amend the ODI filing: report the reduced investment scale to the NDRC/MOFCOM and amend the MOFCOM certificate. The withdrawable amount equals the reduction recognised at both ends — the bank will only remit the sum matching the amended ODI file.
Partial withdrawal via transfer
The Chinese investor sells part of its stake to a partner (Vietnamese or third-country) while retaining the rest: in Vietnam, complete the partial transfer plus IRC amendment (investor-structure change); in China, amend the ODI scale downward by the sold portion. Sale proceeds return to China through the ODI account — treated as capital recovery (not profit), with Vietnamese capital-transfer tax duties settled first.
Downsizing the project (reducing total investment)
A project registered at USD 50 million but actually deploying 30 million: the “uncontributed” 20 million is not a withdrawal — but if the ODI certificate records 50 million while only 30 million was remitted, the ODI file hangs with 20 million “unperformed”. At settlement time or the next ODI filing, the authority will ask about the gap. The correct handling: reduce the registered total investment on both the IRC (Vietnam) and the ODI file (China) to match reality, rather than leaving the file hanging.
Recommended coordination sequence
Step 1: board/shareholder resolutions on both sides approving the reduction/partial transfer. Step 2: file the ODI amendment in China (NDRC/MOFCOM) — ideally before or in parallel with the Vietnamese steps, because the bank needs the amended ODI file before remitting. Step 3: execute the reduction/transfer and amend the IRC in Vietnam; settle transfer taxes (CIT/PIT on the capital transfer). Step 4: remit the withdrawn capital through the amended ODI account. Step 5: close out and archive. Special note: if the withdrawal changes ownership ratios so as to lose control or trigger mandatory-offer or concentration-notification duties, assess further under the 2020 Enterprise Law and the 2018 Competition Law.
The tax dimension of partial exits
Partial withdrawals have a tax profile distinct from full liquidation. The gain on a partial transfer is the transfer price minus the pro-rata acquisition cost of the portion sold — keep clear records of the original contribution tranches, because tax authorities will reconstruct the cost base from the capital account history. Where the transfer is between related parties (for example, selling part of the stake to another group company), transfer-pricing rules apply to the price itself: an off-market price invites adjustment. And where the Vietnamese company distributes retained earnings before the partial sale to “clean” the balance sheet, sequence the dividend and the transfer correctly — a pre-sale dividend changes the equity value and hence the taxable gain, and each step needs its own tax filing. Modelling the after-tax proceeds of each withdrawal route before choosing one is not optional; it is where the real money is won or lost. Run the model with your tax advisor before the board approves the exit route — once dividends are declared under the wrong structure, the extra tax is unrecoverable. And keep the modelling file: if SAFE or the Vietnamese tax authority asks questions two years later, the contemporaneous analysis is your best defence.
The NDRC coordination roadmap for exits — step by step
Before signing the transfer contract
Don’t sign the capital/project transfer contract and then ask “will NDRC allow it”. Right sequence: (1) agree the exit plan internally (sell to whom, at what price, money home when); (2) pre-consult NDRC on the plan (approval/filing adjustment needed?); (3) then sign with an ODI-approval condition precedent. A contract without that condition, if NDRC refuses, means breaching with the buyer — damages.
During repatriation
Exit proceeds return to China in tranches (deposit, main payment, warranty retention) — each tranche gets bank-screened. Prepare: transfer contract + ODI approval/filing adjustment + Vietnamese tax-clearance evidence. Trap: retention money for warranties — returning 2 years later — by which time the ODI file is “cold” and banks re-screen from scratch. Fix: declare the full schedule (including retention) to the bank upfront.
After the money is home — don’t forget to “close the books”
Money home doesn’t mean done: file a completion report with ODI authorities (project fully exited, status updated), and archive (contracts, approvals, transfer records, both countries’ tax filings) for at least 5–10 years — for future inspections and the next ODI round. Classic black mark: exiting without reporting → next ODI application draws “where’s the old project” → jam.
Capital withdrawal and ODI — the coordination sequence
Withdrawing capital from Vietnam is not only Vietnamese procedure (dissolution/transfer, tax finalisation, DICA remittance) — it needs coordination with Chinese ODI approvals. Sequence: (1) decide withdrawal (group internal); (2) notify/report Chinese ODI authorities (depending on level — some cases need prior approval); (3) execute Vietnamese procedures; (4) report completion back to China (closing the ODI file). Never invert the order (withdrawing first, reporting after — potentially a breach of ODI duties).
Partial vs full withdrawal — different ODI implications
Partial withdrawal (reducing capital, selling a stake) may only need ODI change filing — the project continues, just smaller. Full withdrawal (dissolution, 100% sale) triggers ODI closure — the file ends. Know which you’re doing before approaching regulators — applying for closure when you meant reduction creates unnecessary complications (reopening a closed ODI file is harder than amending an open one). Document the board’s intent clearly (partial vs full) — regulators act on what’s filed, not what’s intended.
Coordinated withdrawal checklist
(1) Identify the withdrawal form: charter capital reduction, partial transfer, or project downsizing; (2) compute Vietnamese tax duties (capital-transfer tax, asset-liquidation tax if any); (3) prepare the ODI amendment dossier (NDRC/MOFCOM) — new scale, new form; (4) file the ODI amendment before/in parallel with Vietnamese procedures; (5) amend the IRC and enterprise registration in Vietnam; (6) settle taxes and obtain clearance; (7) remit through the amended ODI account; (8) update group accounting and consolidated financial statements. Warning: “informal” withdrawals (routing money home through sham trade payments) are serious foreign-exchange violations in both countries.
Contact us
FLAT Law Firm advises Chinese investors in Vietnam across the full lifecycle: investment structuring, IRC/ERC procedures, tax, labour, intellectual property and dispute resolution. Contact us for advice tailored to your case.
This article has been quality-reviewed by the FLAW AI Legal Council
