Corporate & Governance

Legal Risk Checklist for Doing Business in Vietnam

Legal Risk Checklist for Doing Business in Vietnam

Corporate Legal

Most corporate legal damage comes not from one big mistake but from small overlooked points: a hastily written contract clause, an expired sub-license nobody noticed, a tax obligation arising from accounting treatment, or a failed labor disciplinary case due to incomplete records. This checklist systematizes the 8 risk groups counsel usually check first when reviewing an operating business in Vietnam.

Quick Summary

Audience: businesses operating in Vietnam, investors preparing to expand, in-house legal teams. Scope: 8 risk groups — establishment and structure, licenses, contracts, labor, tax, land, IP and data, disputes — with a periodic review process. Main basis: 2020 Enterprise Law (amended by Law 76/2025/QH15, effective 01/7/2025), Decree 168/2025/ND-CP on business registration, 2015 Civil Code, 2019 Labor Code, Law 108/2025/QH15 on Tax Administration (effective 01/7/2026). This article is general guidance; figures, deadlines, and penalty levels should be checked against the latest instruments or discussed with counsel before applying.

1. Establishment and Corporate Structure

Establishment records may seem closed once the Enterprise Registration Certificate is issued, but risks often linger in the structure. The first check is capital contribution status: whether members and shareholders contributed the full charter capital on time and in the committed asset form. Shortfalls are not only administrative violations but also affect membership standing and liability for the company’s debts.

Next, the legal representative: is the registered information still accurate for the person actually managing and signing? After rounds of administrative reorganization and changes to business registration under Decree 168/2025/ND-CP, businesses should re-check all registered information — head-office address, business lines, legal representative — to ensure it matches actual operations. An address on the license differing from the actual operating address is a very common error and easily penalized upon inspection.

For companies with multiple members, review the charter and internal agreements: voting ratios, capital transfer mechanisms, conflict-of-interest rules. The 2020 Enterprise Law as amended by Law 76/2025/QH15 (effective 01/7/2025); charters drafted years ago may be outdated against the new framework, particularly on beneficial ownership and information disclosure. See also authority to sign contracts in enterprises for systematizing internal authorization and delegation.

2. Licenses and business conditions

Many business lines in Vietnam are conditional: sub-licenses, practicing certificates, or conditions on capital, personnel, and facilities are required before and throughout operations. The most common risk is a license expiring without timely renewal, or the business expanding into a new line while forgetting to add the corresponding conditions.

A less-noticed point: after changes to the organizational apparatus and administrative boundaries, the authority issuing certain license types may have shifted to another agency. Businesses should reconfirm the currently competent authority for each license they hold, rather than defaulting to filing renewals where first issued. Filing with the wrong agency wastes time and can leave the business in a legal gap during transition.

For foreign-invested enterprises, pay special attention to market access conditions and periodic investment reporting obligations. Reporting violations usually cause no immediate consequence but surface when the business adjusts a project, transfers capital, or dissolves.

3. Commercial contracts

Contracts are where legal risk “hibernates” longest: an unfavorable clause can lie dormant for years then erupt when the cooperation breaks down. In review, focus on four clause clusters: scope of obligations and acceptance standards (ambiguity breeds disputes), payment and breach penalties, limitation of liability and indemnity, and dispute resolution clauses.

On breach penalties, Article 301 of the 2005 Commercial Law caps penalties at 8% of the value of the breached contractual obligation (except damages under Article 266) — this rule remains in force and businesses should cite it correctly in negotiations rather than applying an unverified “word-of-mouth” figure.

Dispute resolution clauses deserve separate review: court or arbitration chosen, the arbitration center and procedural rules clearly identified. Under the 2010 Commercial Arbitration Law (court jurisdiction in Article 7(3) as amended by Law 81/2025/QH15, effective 01/7/2025), most court-support requests for arbitration now fall to Regional People’s Courts — businesses that signed arbitration clauses before this date should update their understanding of their “supervising court.”

Technical detail on each clause type is in legal risks in commercial contracts, limitation of liability clauses, security for obligations, and contract appendices and amendments. Overall service page: commercial contract advisory.

4. Labor and social insurance

Labor disputes are the highest-frequency risk in daily operations. Three hotspots to review: form and content of labor contracts (correctly classifying definite/indefinite-term contracts under the 2019 Labor Code), disciplinary records (internal labor regulations registered, disciplinary procedures lawful — where businesses lose lawsuits most), and contract termination (grounds, notice periods, severance and retrenchment allowances).

For foreign employees, check that work permits remain valid and the job scope stated matches actual work. Employing foreigners without permits or outside the permitted scope carries heavy penalties and may lead to deportation.

On social insurance, the common risk is under-contribution or wrong coverage. When the insurance agency audits, arrears plus late-payment amounts can be significant for businesses with many employees. Periodically reconcile the actual headcount against the insured list.

5. Tax and financial obligations

Tax risk rarely surfaces immediately; it accumulates through settlement periods then erupts upon tax inspection. Review points include: invoices and vouchers (validity of input invoices, especially for large expenses), deductible expenses for corporate income tax (invoice conditions, non-cash payment vouchers), and withholding obligations (employees’ personal income tax, contractor tax on outbound payments).

Law 108/2025/QH15 on Tax Administration (effective 01/7/2026) continues tightening invoice, voucher, and taxpayer-responsibility management — businesses should proactively prepare accounting and documentation systems before the effective date rather than waiting for inspection. For related-party transactions, transfer pricing documentation must be prepared on time; missing it is a common cause of tax reassessment.

Scope note: FLAT LAW FIRM advises on tax from a legal perspective — risk assessment, disputes with tax authorities, transaction structuring — and does not provide pure accounting or tax filing services.

6. Land, premises, and assets

For businesses leasing premises, the biggest risk lies in the legal status of the leased asset: whether the lessor is the lawful land user, whether the land is mortgaged or disputed, whether the land use purpose fits the lessee’s business. Leasing premises on land with an unsuitable use purpose can block fire-safety licensing or trigger penalties.

Lease contracts should be reviewed on term and renewal, early termination conditions and compensation, and the lessee’s rights over fixtures upon expiry. Many prolonged premises disputes drag on simply because the contract did not specify the fate of improvements the lessee invested in.

For businesses allocated or leased land directly by the State, check that land financial obligations are fully discharged and that land use matches the purpose and project schedule. Land slow to be put into use against schedule may be recovered under the 2024 Land Law.

7. Intellectual property and data

The two most easily overlooked intangible assets are brands and data. On brands: has the business registered trademark protection for the name and logo in use, and does the protection scope cover all product and service groups currently traded? The IP Law as amended by Law 07/2022/QH15; long-registered marks should be re-checked for validity and renewability. Trademark disputes in Vietnam are increasingly common as the market develops.

On data: at what scale does the business collect and process personal data of customers and employees, and does it have consent and data protection mechanisms consistent with the Law on Personal Data Protection 91/2025/QH15 and Decree 356/2025/ND-CP? The personal data protection legal framework has been completed with a new specialized law (effective 01/01/2026); businesses processing data at scale or transferring data abroad should monitor closely and prepare personal data processing impact assessments.

Ownership of works and inventions created by employees during employment should also be allocated in the labor contract or a separate agreement — by the time the employee leaves and a dispute arises, evidence is often no longer complete.

8. Disputes and resolution mechanisms

Not every business relationship needs dispute preparation, but businesses should have a ready process for when disputes arise: who is the focal point, which deadlines must be met, what evidence to collect and preserve from the start. Many cases are lost not for lack of merit but because evidence was lost or the limitation period expired.

On evidence collection and preservation: work emails, messages, acceptance minutes, handover vouchers — all should be stored systematically during operations, not hunted down when a dispute arises. For electronic evidence, note the requirements on integrity and provable origin when presented before courts or tribunals.

Businesses should also reassess the dispute resolution mechanisms in their framework contracts: still suited to current transaction scale and nature, accounting for the cost and time of each method. The earlier a dispute is handled at negotiation level, the lower the cost — a clear internal complaint procedure in the contract is worth more than many realize.

9. Periodic review process in operations

A checklist only works when run periodically, not done once and filed away. A minimum process an in-house legal team or management can apply:

Quarterly: review contracts nearing expiry and auto-renewal clauses; check licenses nearing expiry; reconcile headcount against insurance records; update on new legal instruments affecting the business’s industry.

Annually: comprehensively review the charter and internal agreements; reassess the template contract system; check IP status; take stock of tax and land financial obligations; evaluate dispute resolution mechanisms in framework contracts. Detail on contract review methodology is in periodic contract review for enterprises.

Event-driven: whenever major changes occur — change of legal representative, ownership restructuring, new business lines, large-value contracts, or significant legal amendments — trigger a focused review.

10. When to contact counsel

Not every risk needs counsel’s intervention, but there are moments when counsel’s fees always cost less than remediation: before signing large-value or long-term contracts; upon receiving inspection decisions from state agencies; upon discovering internal violations needing a remediation plan; when a dispute has arisen and goodwill negotiation is exhausted; and before structural transactions such as acquisitions, mergers, or demergers.

General principle: the earlier counsel is involved, the more options remain. Once matters reach litigation or penalties, the scope is usually limited to damage control.

11. How FLAT LAW FIRM Helps

FLAT LAW FIRM provides legal health check services for businesses operating in Vietnam: assessing the 8 risk groups above, producing a prioritized report and remediation roadmap. The service is modular — businesses may choose a full review or focus on risk groups of concern, e.g. contracts only or labor–tax compliance only.

Beyond periodic reviews, we regularly advise FDI and domestic enterprises on investment, contracts, M&A, labor, tax (from a legal perspective), intellectual property, and dispute resolution — including China-related transactions through the firm’s China Desk.

Need a legal risk review for your business? Contact FLAT LAW FIRM for an approach suited to your scale and industry.

Contact for advice

12. Frequently Asked Questions

Do small businesses need a legal health check?

Yes, but with a leaner scope. The smaller the business, the lower its capacity to absorb a legal shock (a large penalty decision, a collective labor lawsuit). A focused review of the 3 biggest risk groups — contracts, labor, tax — is usually enough at the early stage.

How often should legal review be conducted?

Good practice is a light quarterly review plus a comprehensive annual review, with event-driven reviews when major changes occur in key personnel, ownership structure, or the legal framework. Specific frequency depends on industry and scale.

When does Law 108/2025/QH15 on Tax Administration take effect and how does it affect businesses?

The law takes effect on 01/7/2026, with tighter rules on invoice and voucher management and taxpayer responsibilities. Businesses should proactively standardize accounting and documentation systems before this date rather than waiting for inspection.

Which legal risks do FDI enterprises most often overlook?

Practical experience shows three commonly missed points: market access conditions and periodic investment reporting obligations; work permits for foreigners not matching actual jobs; and dispute resolution clauses in contracts that ignore the real cost and time of the chosen method.

How should internally discovered violations be handled?

Prioritize assessing the extent and self-remediation capacity before state agencies discover them — in many cases, proactive remediation and reporting are mitigating circumstances. However, the specific approach depends on the violation type; consult counsel before any formal correspondence with authorities.

Website content is for general information only and does not substitute for legal advice on specific cases.

Laws and administrative procedures may change over time. Readers should consult counsel before making decisions or executing transactions.