Scenario: a foreign entertainment group plans a cinema chain in Vietnam plus distribution rights for its film catalogue, treating it as one ‘film business’. It is three: film production, film distribution and classification, and cinema operation — each with its own licensing track, and content censorship sitting above all of them.
Three gates, not one
The Cinema Law 05/2022/QH15 (effective 1 January 2023) and Decree 131/2022/ND-CP structure the industry in layers:
- Production: filmmaking requires production licensing conditions; co-productions with Vietnamese partners follow their own approval track.
- Distribution and classification: films must be classified (the age-rating system) before public screening or distribution; the classification decision is a state act, not a commercial one.
- Cinema operation: operating cinemas requires meeting conditions on facilities and fire safety, plus business registration for the activity.
An investor holding cinemas but no distribution rights is a landlord with screens; an investor holding distribution rights but no classified films has paper with no product. The three tracks must be planned together.
Content censorship: the gate above the gates
Unlike most sectors where the license is the final word, in cinema the content decision can override commercial planning: a film refused classification or ordered edited cannot be screened regardless of how perfect the investment file is. Contracts for film acquisition and distribution must allocate this risk — who bears the loss if a title fails classification, and what happens to minimum guarantees.
Foreign investors should also note that the law treats Vietnamese and foreign films under the same classification system, but the practical review of foreign content — including dubbed and subtitled versions — adds time to release schedules.
Foreign capital: conditions, not a single ratio
No single published foreign ownership ratio governs the whole film value chain; each segment follows the general market access conditions for foreign investors (Article 8, Investment Law 143/2025/QH15) plus its sectoral license. The binding constraint in practice is rarely the equity percentage — it is the classification outcome and the licensing timeline. Investors should sequence: market access filing, then production or distribution licensing, then classification applications timed to release windows.
Frequently asked questions
1. Can a foreign investor own 100% of a cinema chain?
Ownership follows the general market access conditions; the operational gates are facility licensing and business registration rather than a statutory equity cap.
2. Who classifies films in Vietnam?
Classification is a state function under the Cinema Law framework; distributors apply and receive the classification decision before screening.
3. What happens if a film fails classification?
It cannot be publicly screened or distributed in that version; acquisition contracts should allocate this risk between licensor and distributor.
4. Do dubbed/subtitled versions need separate classification?
Each released version is assessed; investors should budget review time for localized versions in the release plan.
5. Can one company do production, distribution and cinemas?
Yes, but each activity needs its own licensing track — holding one license does not cover the others.
Related articles
- Technology Transfer in Vietnam: Contracts and Registration for Foreign Investors
- Investment Violations in Vietnam: Administrative Sanctions Investors Must Know
- Commentary on Decree 96/2026/ND-CP: Investment Registration and Deadline Issues
- Setting Up a Company in Vietnam vs Canada: Federal, Provincial and IRC
- Setting Up a Company in Vietnam vs the Netherlands: Procedures, Capital and Timelines
