FLAT LAW FIRM
Request a consultation

Tax

Situation: Corporate Tax Incentives Expiring — Can They Be Extended

8 min readFLAT LAW FIRM
Ưu đãi thuế hết hạn có được gia hạn không — đồng hồ cát và nhà máy

The CFO of an FDI company called us anxiously: "Next year our CIT holiday ends. From paying zero to 20% on profits — management asks if there's any way to extend the incentives?" The "extend tax incentives Vietnam" question is one almost every FDI business asks once in a project's life. And the answer — though no one wants to hear it — must be stated plainly from the start.

Table of contents

1. The situation: the board's letter and surging tax payable

The company here is an FDI electronics-component manufacturer in a northern industrial park, operating since 2016. The project enjoyed CIT incentives on a schedule: tax holidays for the first profitable years, then 50% reductions for subsequent years, plus a preferential rate below the standard 20% for a defined period.

Ten years passed faster than expected. This year is the last of the reduction period. From next year, the company pays CIT at the standard 20% on all taxable income — tax payable multiplying from the prior year. The regional board wrote demanding the Vietnam management "find every way" to extend incentives, as regional plants (Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia) still enjoy competitive packages.

The question for lawyers: does Vietnamese law have any incentive-extension mechanism? And if not, what lawful options remain?

2. The straight answer: expired incentives cannot be extended

The answer is no. CIT incentives under Vietnamese law are designed as a "package" tied to each specific investment project: preferential rates for defined years, holidays for some years, reductions for following years — counted from the year the project earns taxable income (or revenue, depending on each period's rules).

When the package period ends, the business naturally moves to standard tax obligations. Current law — including the CIT Law 2025 (67/2025/QH15) and Decree 320/2025/ND-CP — provides no procedure for "applying to extend" the incentive period of the same project. No application form, no approving authority exists, because the mechanism does not exist.

This fundamentally differs from other policies (like extending a project's operational duration, or tax payment deferral in hardship) — those have clear extension mechanisms; tax incentives do not.

3. Why the law does not allow tax incentive extensions

The policy logic is clear:

  1. Incentives attract initial investment, not permanent subsidies. The State uses tax incentives to offset market-entry costs and early investment risks. After 10–15 years of stable, profitable operation, continued incentives no longer serve the policy goal.
  2. Fairness among businesses. Discretionary extensions would give early entrants permanent tax advantages over later entrants — contrary to equal competition.
  3. International commitments. With the Global Minimum Tax (15% under OECD Pillar 2, which Vietnam has domesticated), extending low-rate incentives for large enterprises has little practical meaning — the tax "saved" in Vietnam gets topped up at headquarters jurisdiction.

Understanding this logic, businesses should stop seeking "extensions" and pursue genuinely lawful solutions — in the following sections.

4. Distinguishing: expiry, revocation, and policy transition

Before solutions, distinguish three often-confused situations:

  • Incentive expiry: the scenario company's case — all conditions met, simply "out of time." No extension mechanism, but no penalties either.
  • Early revocation: when the business no longer meets incentive conditions (e.g., failing labor requirements, transferring the project, changing business lines). Severe consequences: full clawback of exempted/reduced tax, plus penalties and late-payment interest.
  • Policy transition when laws change: when the new CIT Law (2025) replaces the old, projects enjoying incentives get transitional clauses — usually continuing to the determined period's end. This is not "extension" but protection of vested rights.

In practice, we meet businesses thinking their incentives "expired" when they're actually "about to be revoked" for condition violations — handled completely differently.

5. Scenario 1: holiday ended but reduction period remains

CIT incentive schedules are often multi-layered: holidays for early years, then 50% reductions, while the preferential rate (below 20%) applies over an even longer period. A common accounting mistake is equating "holiday ended" with "incentives ended."

In the electronics-component company's case: this year the 50% reduction ends, but the preferential-rate period may still have years left. The gap between the preferential and standard 20% rates remains significant savings. So the first step is not seeking extension but precisely reviewing when each incentive layer remains effective — many businesses miss this layer because accounting only tracks the "holiday/reduction" milestone.

6. Scenario 2: expansion investment — a chance for new incentives

This is the most lawful and common path to continued incentives after the old package expires. Under regulations, an expansion investment project meeting defined conditions (additional capital scale, capacity increases, technology renewal) is treated as a new investment project and may enjoy CIT incentives for the incremental income.

Key conditions:

  • The expansion must be approved by the competent authority (amended Investment Registration Certificate).
  • Income from the expansion must be separately accounted from current operations — the point tax authorities scrutinize most.
  • Quantitative criteria on capital, capacity, and technology must meet Decree 320/2025/ND-CP.

For the scenario company, if it plans factory expansion, capacity upgrades, or new technology lines in the next 1–2 years, structuring this as a qualifying "expansion investment project" brings a fully lawful new incentive package — instead of hopelessly trying to extend the old one.

Some businesses consider establishing a new legal entity for a "new project" to enjoy incentives from scratch. A blunt warning: if the new entity is just "old wine in a new bottle" — same factory, same machinery, same operations, only a changed company name — tax authorities have full grounds to treat this as lacking genuine economic substance, reassessing tax and penalizing under the Law on Tax Administration.

This path is only lawful when the new project has real substance: new investment in incentivized locations/sectors, new jobs, new production capacity. Example: a group opening a second factory in another province with new technology — a genuinely new project deserving incentives. "Splitting the company on paper" to renew incentives for the same old factory is high-risk circumvention.

8. Scenario 4: tax policy changes mid-way

With the CIT Law 2025 effective 01/10/2025, many businesses worry about their ongoing incentives. The general transitional principle: projects enjoying incentives under old rules continue to the period's end, unless new documents have more favorable provisions allowing choice.

Businesses should: (i) compare the specific transitional clauses of the CIT Law 2025 and Decree 320/2025/ND-CP for their project group; (ii) keep full records proving the incentive history for tax inspections. In some cases, new policies may open new incentive groups the project qualifies for — an opportunity, not a risk.

9. Action checklist 12 months before incentives expire

  1. [ ] Precisely review each incentive layer's end date (holiday, reduction, preferential rate) per project.
  2. [ ] Forecast CIT payable at the standard 20% rate for the next 3 years for budgeting.
  3. [ ] Assess expansion investment plans: can they qualify as incentive-bearing expansion projects?
  4. [ ] Re-verify all current incentive conditions — ensure no early revocation from violations.
  5. [ ] Compare the CIT Law 2025's transitional clauses with project status.
  6. [ ] Update pricing policies and long-term customer contracts for the new tax cost.
  7. [ ] Discuss incentive plans for the next phase with the directly managing tax authority (if expanding).
  8. [ ] Never execute "incentive renewal" transactions lacking economic substance.

10. Frequently asked questions

Can expiring corporate income tax incentives be extended?

No. CIT incentives apply for fixed periods tied to each investment project (holiday years, reduction years, preferential-rate periods); when expired, businesses pay at standard rates. Current law has no mechanism to extend the incentive period for the same project.

Can an expansion investment project enjoy new tax incentives?

Possibly, if the expansion qualifies as a new investment project (additional capital scale, capacity increases, technology renewal) and is approved. Incremental income from the expansion may enjoy incentives as a new project — but must be separately accounted from existing operations.

Is splitting a company to "renew" tax incentives legal?

No. Splitting, separating, or merging businesses solely to regain tax incentives for the same investment activity may be treated as lacking genuine economic substance, leading to tax reassessment and penalties. Incentives attach to qualifying investment projects, not legal-entity form.

When the new CIT Law changes incentive policies, what happens to ongoing old incentives?

Transitional principles apply: projects under old rules generally continue to the determined period's end, unless new documents allow more favorable choices. Compare the specific transitional clauses of the CIT Law 2025 and Decree 320/2025/ND-CP.

What should businesses prepare before tax incentives expire?

12 months ahead: review each project's incentive end dates; forecast standard-rate tax for budgeting; assess expansion qualifying for new incentives; re-verify all current conditions to avoid early revocation; update pricing and long-term contracts for the new tax cost.

11. When to work with a lawyer

Tax incentives are where the line between "lawful optimization" and "risky circumvention" is thin — and the price of error is multi-year clawbacks, penalties, and interest. Work with a lawyer when: structuring expansion investments for new incentive packages; reviewing current incentive conditions against revocation risks; assessing the CIT Law 2025's impact on ongoing old incentives; or when tax authorities disagree on your incentive application.

FLAT Law Firm advises on tax from a legal perspective for FDI businesses — from structuring incentives for new and expansion projects to representing businesses with tax authorities on incentive issues. Contact hotline 0988424851 for a review of your project's incentive roadmap.

—

References

  1. CIT Law No. 67/2025/QH15 dated 2025, effective 01/10/2025.
  2. Decree No. 320/2025/ND-CP dated 15/12/2025, effective 15/12/2025 (applicable from the 2025 CIT tax period), guiding the CIT Law.
  3. OECD Pillar 2 — Global Minimum Tax 15% (domesticated in Vietnam).