FLAT Legal Journal
Scenario: an investment-promotion document states: “incentivised projects receive a 50% land-rent reduction”. The sentence is both true and false: current law does contain several genuine 50% land-rent reduction…
Read article ↗
Scenario: an investment fund signs an agreement to acquire 70% of a factory project inside an industrial park. Three months after closing, the tax authority issues a retroactive…
Read article ↗
Scenario: after 12 years of operation, the group decides to sell its factory to another investor: the deal value covers a lump-sum land lease right with 33 years…
Read article ↗
Scenario: a project in an incentivised sector in a disadvantaged area — eligible for 7 years of land-rent exemption after basic construction — yet every year’s land rent…
Read article ↗
Scenario: the project’s first-year land rent notice comes in 40% above the financial model, and nobody on the project team can point to which component of the formula…
Read article ↗
Scenario: a new industrial park opens phase one: rents 25% below filled parks, but internal roads 60% built, the wastewater plant under construction, and official power promised “by…
Read article ↗
Scenario: an investor leases 4 hectares of park land not for its own factory, but to build standard warehouses and lease them to other manufacturers — the booming…
Read article ↗
Scenario: the contract says 3.0 hectares leased; the handover survey fixes 2.87 hectares — 1,300 m² missing, exactly where the auxiliary zone was planned. The developer proposes “just…
Read article ↗
Scenario: the leased plot itself is fully cleared — but in the middle of the park, right at the plot’s boundary, a cluster of households has not accepted…
Read article ↗
Scenario: the factory’s monthly industrial park service invoice has seven fee lines, two of which nobody in the finance team can explain the basis of. Park service charges…
Read article ↗