Sourcing raw materials from China carries distinctive quality risks: geographic distance, differing standards, and the fact that goods are only physically inspected once they reach a Vietnamese port. This article focuses on quality-control clauses tailored to China sourcing — from pre-shipment inspection in China to payment tied to inspection certificates.
1. Quality standards: lock them with specs plus sealed samples
- Attach detailed technical specifications as a contract appendix: composition, tolerances, physico-chemical indicators.
- Cross-check against applicable Vietnamese TCVN/QCVN standards — materials meeting Chinese standards do not necessarily meet Vietnamese ones.
- Sealed samples jointly sealed by both parties and kept with an independent third party — the reference for quality disputes.
2. Pre-shipment inspection in China: the most important clause
Because goods only reach the buyer after a sea voyage, pre-shipment inspection in China is the main line of defense:
- Appoint an independent international inspection body (SGS, Bureau Veritas or equivalent) — never let the supplier self-inspect.
- Define the inspection scope: quantity, quality, packaging, marking, and container-loading supervision.
- Who bears inspection costs — market practice: buyer pays for routine inspections; supplier pays for re-inspection if a lot fails.
- Legal effect: failed inspection → buyer may refuse loading, demand replacement, or cancel the lot without being in breach.
3. Acceptance at port of arrival and claim deadlines
- Provide for acceptance at the arrival port (or buyer’s warehouse) within a set time after berthing.
- Quality-claim deadlines should be shorter than statutory limits to force quick handling — but realistic for sampling and lab testing.
- The general claim period for non-conforming goods is set by Article 318 of the Commercial Law 2005 (applicable absent contractual agreement); buyer inspection and notice duties under CISG Articles 38, 39, 40 (maximum 2 years from delivery).
- Basis of claims: goods not conforming to the contract under Articles 39–40 of the Commercial Law 2005.
4. Remedies for quality breaches
- Contractual penalty: capped at 8% of the value of the breached obligation (Article 301, Commercial Law 2005).
- Damages: under Articles 302–307 of the Commercial Law (actual, provable loss).
- Buyer’s options for non-conforming goods: reject, demand repair, demand replacement, or price reduction (Articles 40, 44, Commercial Law).
5. Payment tied to inspection: L/C requiring an inspection certificate
- Under L/C, include the independent body’s inspection certificate among required documents — the bank pays only against a passing certificate.
- Under deferred T/T, retain a portion of the price (retention) until acceptance at the arrival port.
- Avoid paying 100% before China-side inspection results are in.
6. Incoterms and risk allocation
- FOB: risk passes to the buyer when goods cross the ship’s rail at the Chinese port — the buyer should arrange insurance and control shipment.
- CIF: the Chinese supplier covers freight and insurance to the Vietnamese port — but quality risk still needs separate inspection clauses, since marine insurance does not cover “substandard quality”.
- State the risk transfer point and insurance obligations expressly in the contract.
7. Governing law and dispute resolution
- The CISG applies automatically to sale contracts between Vietnamese and Chinese businesses (both are member states; Vietnam acceded 18 December 2015, effective 1 January 2017) — unless the parties opt out.
- State clearly in the contract whether the CISG or a national law (Vietnamese/Chinese law) governs, to avoid disputes later.
- Arbitration is recommended for Vietnam–China deals (VIAC, SIAC, HKIAC) over litigation — foreign arbitral awards are easier to enforce under the New York Convention.
8. Group 2 goods: the importer’s state inspection duty
- Materials on the Group 2 goods list (potentially unsafe) must undergo state quality inspection registration before customs clearance under Decree 74/2018/ND-CP (amending Decree 132/2008/ND-CP).
- The Vietnamese importer bears full responsibility for compliance — it cannot blame the Chinese supplier if goods are held at port for missing inspection registration.
- Obligate the supplier by contract to provide quality certificates and certificates of origin (C/O) for the inspection file.
FAQ
Q: Is it enough to rely on quality certificates provided by the Chinese supplier?
A: No. Supplier certificates are one-sided documents; for high-value lots, always require independent inspection (SGS/BV) in China before loading.
Q: Is the CISG mandatory for Vietnam–China contracts?
A: The CISG applies automatically when both parties are based in member states and have not opted out. To exclude it, the contract must expressly do so.
Q: Substandard quality is only discovered at the port — who bears it?
A: Depends on the contract: if pre-shipment inspection passed but goods arrive defective, the buyer must show damage arose after inspection (transit, storage). That is why Incoterms plus insurance must accompany quality clauses.
Legal sources
- Commercial Law 2005, Articles 39, 40, 44, 300–312, 318 — thuvienphapluat.vn
- CISG — Vienna Convention 1980 on international sale of goods (Vietnam acceded 18 December 2015, effective 1 January 2017), Articles 35, 38, 39, 40
- Decree 74/2018/ND-CP (amending Decree 132/2008/ND-CP) — state quality inspection of Group 2 goods — thuvienphapluat.vn
This article provides general legal information and is not legal advice for any specific case. Content has been reviewed by the AI Legal Council before publication, not by a human lawyer.
Contact FLAT Law Firm
If your company sources raw materials from China and needs quality-control, inspection, and payment clauses drafted or reviewed, contact our lawyers at contact us.
